SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 1544

VINOD K.SHARMA
K. Chandrasekaran – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation Limited Rep By Its Managing Director – Respondent


JUDGMENT

O.A.No.169 of 2012

The applicant has approached this Court Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Sec.9(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, with the prayer for grant of permanent injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents, representatives or any persons claiming under them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Hotel/Restaurent as a Franchisee running in the name and style of Sindhu Restaurant, Hotel Tamil Nadu, Alagar Koil Road, Madurai pending arbitration proceedings contemplated under Clause 35 of the Agreement, dated 10.9.2007 entered into between the parties.

A.No.1250 of 2012:

1. This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Sec.9(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, has been filed with the prayer for grant of stay of the order of termination, dated 25.2.2012 of the second respondent, pending finalization of Arbitration proceedings contemplated under Clause 35 of the agreement, dated 10.9.2007 between the applicant and the third respondent.

2. It is pleaded that the Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. invited tender on 6.8.2007 for franchise of hotel and restaurants of the Corpor


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top