ELIPE DHARMA RAO, M.VENUGOPAL
Registrar General, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
K. U. Rajasekar – Respondent
M. Venugopal, J.
1. The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ of Certiorari, praying for issuance of an order in calling for the records in Case No.40997/Enquiry/A/2011, dated 02.07.2012, on the file of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai and quash the same.
2. Earlier, the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai, while passing orders in Case No.40997/Enquiry/A/2011 on 02.07.2012 (filed by the Respondent) in Paragraphs 3 and 4, has observed as under:
“3. The Petitioner has preferred the first appeal under Section 19(1) to the appellate authority on 30.06.2011. The appellate authority has furnished the information on 24.08.2011 to the petitioner. Not satisfied with the information supplied, the petitioner has filed the second appeal under Section 19(3) to the Commission on 28.09.2011. On the basis of the petitioner/appellant's second appeal to the Commission, this Commission has issued a direction on 31.10.2011 directing the appellate authority to send his remarks on the comments made by the petitioner to the Commission on 31.10.2011. The petitioner again has filed a petition before the Commission on 20.04.2012. Based on the petition dt.20.04.2012 today
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.