ARUNA JAGADEESAN
V. Barathidasan – Appellant
Versus
J. Ramu – Respondent
1. This revision is filed against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichy in Cr.M.P.No.3817 of 2009 in C.C.No.702 of 2006 dated 13.11.2009 declining to send the documents namely, cheque and promisery note for comparison by the hand writing expert.
2. The short facts are as follows:
The revision petitioner/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.65,000/- from the complainant on 04.01.1997 and executed a pro-note in favour of the complainant for the repayment of the amount borrowed. When the complainant demanded for the repayment of the above said amount, the petitioner/accused in discharging of his partly liability issued a cheque in favour of the complainant on 1309.1997 in cheque No. 0421786 drawn on Indian Overseas Bank, Saliyamangalam, Branch. When the cheque was presented by the complainant for encashment to the City Union Bank limited on 24.09.1997 it was returned with an endorsement as ‘Insufficient Funds’. The said bank intimated the fact of dishonour to the complainant on 24.09.1997. Thereafter, the complainant issued a lawyer’s notice to the petitioner/accused on 28.09.1997 calling upon him to repay the amount covered under the dishonoured cheque
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.