SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 4787

M.Venugopal
K. Mohanan – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathy – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED:
V.M. Balamohan Thampi, for Appellant I. Mohammed Razra, for Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant/complainant has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal as against the order of acquittal dated 30.5.2012 in C.C. No. 40 of 2012 passed by the Learned Fast Track Court No. II, Nagercoil (Magisterial level).

2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court No. II), Nagercoil in C.C. No. 40 of 2012 on 30.5.2012 has inter alia opined that although the presence of P.W.1/Complainant for the purpose of cross-examination is very much essential and also it has been made clear that no further adjournment for the purpose of cross-examination will be granted and further more, his presence is required for the purpose of cross-examination, on 23.5.2012, he has not appeared before the Court (in spite of specific direction in this regard has been issued to him) and added further, there has been no representation on the side of the appellant/complainant and consequently, the respondent/accused has been acquitted as per Section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C., owing to the non-appearance of the appellant/complainant.

3. Feeling dissatisfied that the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court in C.C. No. 40 of 2012 on 30.5.2012, the appellant/complainant has preferred the present Crimi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top