SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 1950

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU
Chenniappan – Appellant
Versus
Valliammal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioners:M. Guruprasad, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This civil revision petition is filed against the order made in I.A.No.598 of 2012 in A.S.No.117 of 2009 in condoning the delay of 613 days in representing the application to set aside the order of dismissal of the appeal for default on 12.08.2010 and to restore the same.

2. The respondents herein have filed the above appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.175 of 2004 which came to be dismissed on 08.12.2008. The said suit was filed by the respondents herein for partition against the petitioners herein. As the said suit for partition came to be dismissed by the trial court, they preferred an appeal in time and however, when the matter was taken up for argument on 12.08.2010 by the Appellate Court, the respondents did not appear and consequently, the appeal came to be dismissed for default on 12.08.2010. They filed the set aside petition on 13.09.2010. When the set aside petition was returned by the office of the court below for effecting certain compliance, the same was not represented within the time and however, it came to be represented after a delay of 613 days by filing an application in I.A.No.598 of 2012, seeking to condone the said delay.

3.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top