SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 2030

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU
Chitra – Appellant
Versus
K. Saravanan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioner:S. Muthukumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Ayyadurai, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. This civil revision petition is filed against the order made in I.A.No.222 of 2008 in H.M.O.P. No.93 of 2004 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Villupuram wherein and whereby the application filed by the petitioner herein under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking to condone the delay of 1382 days in filing a petition to set aside the exparte decree of restitution of conjugal rights, was rejected.

2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. It is seen from the materials placed before this Court by both sides that the respondent herein filed H.M.O.P. No.93 of 2004 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights against the petitioner herein. On 02.02.2005, an exparte decree came to be passed in the said petition. As the petitioner herein did not comply with the decree granted for restitution of conjugal rights, the respondent/husband subsequently filed H.M.O.P. No.45 of 2006, seeking for divorce. The said petition for divorce, after contest, was decreed on 23.12.2008. Before the grant of such decree, the petitioner herein filed I.A.No.222 of 2008 in H.M.O.P.No.93 of 2004 on 14.12.2008 under secti











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top