SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 2118

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Jayamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
Palani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellants:S. Sathish Rajan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mrs. Usha Raman, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam dated 10.09.2009 made in A.S.No.32/1995 on the file of the Sub Court, Tindivanam. Palani, the first respondent in the second appeal filed the suit O.S.No.607/1989 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Tindivanam for partition, separate possession and for mesne profits against 1) Thirumal, 2) Rasu and 3) Jayamoorthy (the first appellant in the second appeal) ranking them as defendants 1 to 3 respectively. The suit was dismissed with cost by the trial court by its judgment and decree dated 31.03.1995. As against the same, the plaintiff Palani (first respondent in the second appeal) filed A.S.No.32/1995 on the file of the Sub Court, Tindivanam. The learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam by the impugned judgment and decree dated 10.09.2009 allowed the appeal, set aside the decree of the trial court dismissing the suit and granted a preliminary decree for partition holding that the plaintiff was entitled to 1/3 share in the suit properties and directing division of the suit property in to three equal shares and allotment of one such share to the pla







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top