SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 1884

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. HARIPARANTHAMAN, J.

P. Suresh Kumar & Others
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Chennai & Others
W.P.No. 13852 of 2013
Decided on: 05-06-2013

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioners:L.S.M. Hasan Fizal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: S. Diwakar, Addnl. Government Pleader.

The completion of probation and eligibility for promotion entitled the petitioners to be promoted as Assistants, despite the delay in completing the training.

Headnote:

Promotion - Government Service - Probation - Junior Assistant - Assistant - Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Department - The court directed the promotion of petitioners to the post of Assistants on par with their juniors and granted them all monetary benefits and appropriate seniority.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners joined Government service as Junior Assistants and were denied promotion due to non-completion of Bhavani Sagar Training, which was not their fault. After completing the training belatedly, they sought promotion and other benefits on par with their juniors.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were not at fault for the delay in completing the training and that their probation had been declared. The court directed the promotion of the petitioners to the post of Assistants, inclusion in the panel of Junior Assistants fit for promotion, and granted them all monetary benefits and appropriate seniority.

Issues: The issues involved the denial of promotion to the petitioners due to non-completion of training, despite their probation being declared and completion of the training belatedly.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the non-declaration of probation on the ground of non-completion of training cannot be put against the petitioners, especially when their juniors were promoted. The completion of probation and eligibility for promotion entitled the petitioners to be promoted as Assistants.

Final Decision: The court directed the promotion of the petitioners to the post of Assistants on par with their juniors, inclusion in the panel of Junior Assistants fit for promotion, and granted them all monetary benefits and appropriate seniority. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

JUDGMENT

1. The 1st petitioner, had joined Government service as an Assistant in Secretariat Service, temporarily on consolidated pay of Rs.4,000/- vide G.O.Ms.No.85, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, Dated 04.07.2003. Later he was shifted to TASMAC. Subsequently, he emerged successful in the Group IV Services Special Recruitment Examinations 2007-2008 conducted on 17.02.2008 by the Tamilnadu Public Service Commission. He was allotted to Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Department vide letter of Secretary, TNPSC, in No.5435/SCE/APD-4/2009, dated 07.05.2009 and he was appointed as Junior Assistant in the scale of pay of Rs.3200– 85–4900 vide Na.Ka.No.A4/17056/2006, dated 23.05.2009 of the 4th respondent. He was ranked 9th in the seniority fixed by the Tamilnadu Public Service Commission.

2. The 2nd and the 3rd petitioners also joined the Government service in July 2003 on consolidated pay vide G.O.Ms.Nos.84 & 85, dated 04.07.2003. Both of them successfully passed the Special Recruitment Examinations 2007 – 2008 and they were also allotted to Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Department. The TNPSC seniority of 2nd and 3rd petitioners is 13 & 14 respectively.

3. It is also the case of the petitioners that during December 2009, they passed the departmental tests viz., Account Test for Subordinate Officers – Part - I and Tamilnadu Government Office Manual Test (District Office Manual – DOM) for being eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant. The same is also entered in their Service Registers. While so, the juniors of the petitioners were promoted by order dated 01.06.2012 and the petitioners were denied promotion on the ground that their probation was not declared since they did not complete the Bhavani Sagar Training. According to the petitioners, the respondent did not send the petitioners for Bhavani Sagar Training, while their juniors were sent for Bhavani Sagar Training. Hence, it was not their fault.

4. I am in full agreement with the contentions raised by the petitioners that they are not at fault for not completing Bhavani Sagar training, when their juniors completed the training. Hence, they cannot be blamed for the same. Now, they were sent to Bhavani Sagar Training belatedly and they have completed the training during 04.01.2012 to 20.02.2012.

5. In the said circumstances, when the juniors were promoted on 01.06.2012 as Assistants, the petitioners, should also be promoted as Assistants. The non declaration of probation in the post of Junior Assistant on the ground of non completion of Bhavani Sagar Training, cannot be put against the petitioners. In fact, now an order dated 25.04.2013, is produced by the learned Government Advocate that the probation is declared in the case of the petitioners. As per the aforesaid order the petitioners have completed their probation long back i.e., on 11.06.2011(FN), 07.06.2011(FN) and 31.05.2011(FN), respectively. Since the petitioners completed probation long back and they are also eligible for promotion to the post of Assistants, they should be promoted as Assistants.

6. The petitioners have filed this writ petition, seeking to declare their probation in the post of Junior Assistant; also include their names in the panel of Junior Assistants fit for promotion to the post of Assistant in Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Department; promote them to the post of Assistants on par with their juniors; place them in the appropriate seniority and grant them the pay, service, monetary and all other benefits on par with their juniors, within a time frame.

7. As the first portion of the prayer is concerned, now, the respondents have declared the probation of the petitioners in the post of Junior Assistant vide order dated 25.04.2013. Hence, no further order is necessary. Further, in view of the above discussion, the petitioners are entitled to be included in the panel of Junior Assistants fit for promotion to the post of Assistant in Civil Supplies & Consumer P



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top