ELIPE DHARMA RAO, M.VENUGOPAL
Registrar General, High Court of Madras – Appellant
Versus
A. Kanagaraj – Respondent
M. Venugopal, J.
1. The Petitioner/Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai, has focused the present Writ of Certiorari in calling for the records in Case No.18603-11 & 12498-12/Enquiry/A/2012, dated 17.05.2012 of the 2nd Respondent/Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai and to quash the same.
2. The 2nd Respondent/Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai, in Case No.18603-11 & 12498-12/Enquiry/A/2012, dated 17.05.2012, has passed an order inter alia observing that “the Petitioner has requested for the documents relating to the Writ Petitions in the Court. It has already been mentioned on numerous occasions about the decision of the Commission in regard to the receipt of documents and copies from the Court. However, it is evident that in this instance, the Public Authority (Writ Petitioner) has not furnished any information to the Petitioner (First Respondent/ Applicant). As per the Right to Information Act, the information sought for by the Petitioner (1st Respondent/Applicant) ought to have been furnished to him, within thirty days or he should have been informed the procedures/methods in receiving those information. In this matter, the Public Authority
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain and others
The State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, The state of Maharashtra, Intervener
Ahmedabad Education Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Poornaprajna House Building Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Karnataka Information Commissioner & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.