SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 2473

M.VENUGOPAL
Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
Kolandayee – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N. Manokaran, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Notice Served.

Judgment :-

1. The Petitioner/Plaintiff has focused the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 10.07.2009 in I.A.No.566 of 2009 in O.S.No.87 of 2008 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Tiruchengode.

2. The Learned District Munsif, Tiruchengode while passing the impugned order dated 10.07.2009 in I.A.No.566 of 2009 in O.S.No.87 of 2008 has inter alia observed that 'even though the application filed by the Respondent/Defendant is a belated one, yet the suit enquiry will have to be proceeded in a proper manner keeping in tune with the contentions raised in the Written Statement, from the beginning, this Court accepts the plea of the Respondent/Defendant and resultantly, allowed the application by ordering the signature, finger print and the contents of Ex.A1, age of the ink, etc., to be compared with that of admitted signature and the finger print and to submit his report.

3. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Plaintiff submits that the order of the trial Court passed in I.A.No.566 of 2009 in O.S.No.87 of 2008 dated 10.07.2009 is against law and all probabilities of the case.

4. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Plaintiff urges before this Court that the


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top