SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 189

S.TAMILVANAN
G. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
D. Neelamegam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ms.D.Tamilselvi
Mr.P.Venkatesan

JUDGMENT

The Second Appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.03.2009 made in A.S.No.395 of 2008 on the file of the learned VI Additional City Civil Judge , Chennai , reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2007 made in O.S.No.6559 of 2005 on the file of the VII I Assistant City Civil Judge , Chennai.

2. The Appellants herein are the plaintiffs in the suit. They filed the suit before the Court below seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants who are the respondents herein, their agents, servants etc., from in any way interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of property bearing No.31,M.G.R. Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai- 99. According to the appellants/ plaintiffs, the land belonged to the Government which is a poromboke land and a superstructure therein was put up by the plaintiffs, for which "B" memo was issued by the Government. The suit property consisting of ground floor and first floor having two shops in each floor. In the plaint, the appellants herein have stated that the first plaintiff has been in possession of the suit property since 1980 without any hindrance and he obtained electricity service connection and



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top