High Court of Judicature at Madras
S. RAJESWARAN & A. ARUMUGHASWAMY, JJ.
Udhaya @ Udhayakumar & Others
Versus
State rep. by the Asst. Commissioner
Criminal Appeal Nos. 695 & 751 of 2010 & 83 of 2011 & 17 of 2011
Decided On : 04-10-2013
Conspiracy - Criminal Appeal Nos. 695 of 2010, 751 of 2010 and 83 of 2011 - IPC 120(B), 460, 382, 302 r/w 34 - The court found the accused guilty of the offences and convicted them. However, due to deficiencies in the investigation, the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the investigating agency for reinvestigation afresh in two parts.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the murder of Dr. Saravanan, his wife, and their maidservant, with an intention to loot their wealth. The accused were convicted based on the prosecution's case of conspiracy and involvement in the crime. However, deficiencies in the investigation raised doubts about the veracity of the prosecution's case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found deficiencies in the investigation, including lack of evidence for the accused's entry into the house, absence of identification parade, and discrepancies in the recovery of material objects. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the investigation and ordered the matter to be remitted back to the investigating agency for reinvestigation.
Issues: The main issues included lack of evidence for the accused's entry into the house, absence of identification parade, discrepancies in the recovery of material objects, and deficiencies in the investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The deficiencies in the investigation, including lack of evidence and discrepancies, raised doubts about the veracity of the prosecution's case. The court ordered the matter to be remitted back to the investigating agency for reinvestigation to rectify the defects and ensure justice.
Final Decision: The judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the investigating agency for reinvestigation afresh in two parts. The accused were directed to cooperate for reinvestigation and were allowed to file bail applications.
A. Arumughaswamy, J.
1. Criminal Appeal Nos. 695 of 2010, 751 of 2010 and 83 of 2011 have been filed by the accused 1 to 4 against the conviction and sentence imposed against them in judgment dated 22.10.2010 delivered by the Additional District and Sessions Judge-Fast Track Court No.V, Chennai in S.C.No.316 of 2010. Criminal Appeal No.17 of 2011 has been filed by the third part praying to set aside the said judgment in so far as the disposal of Material Object No.109.
2. The Accused 1 to 4 are the appellants. Subsequent to the occurrence, one Sathish who has been arrayed as A5 died by committing suicide and his wife is A4. The conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court are:
A1 to A4 u/s 120(B) of IPC .. 7 years R.I. each and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each i/d to undergo 1 month R.I. each
A1 and A2 u/s 460 IPC .. 7 years R.I. each and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- each and i/d to undergo 3 months R.I. each.
A3 and A4 u/s 460 r/w 120(B) IPC .. 7 years R.I. each and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-each and i/d to undergo 3 months R.I each.
A1 and A2 u/s 382 IPC .. 7 years R.I. each and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default to undergo 4 months R.I. each.
A3 and A4 u/s 382 r/w 120(B) IPC: 7 years R.I. each and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-each and i/d to undergo 4 months R.I. each.
A1 and A2 u/s 302 r/w 34 IPC (3 counts): Life imprisonment (3 counts) each and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- each and i/d 6 months R.I. each.
A3 and A4 u/s 302 r/w 120(B)(3 counts) .. Life imprisonment (3 counts) each and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- each and i/d to undergo 6 months R.I. each.
The sentences are ordered to run concurrently.
M.O.1, 24, 25, 69, 184 and defence M.Os. 1 to 6 are ordered to be retained in file. M.Os. 22, 23, 51, 59, 70, 72, 73, 80, 86 to 91, 92 to 96, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109, 172, 173, 178, 179, 183 are ordered to be confiscated to State after time for appeal is over and if there is no appeal preferred. M.Os. 2 to 21, 47 to 50, 52 to 58, 60 to 68, 71, 81 to 85, 97 to 103, 106, 110 to 118, 119 to 170, 174, 175 and 181 are ordered to be handed over to the legal heir of deceased Saravanan and Kasthuri on proper identification after time for appeal is over and if there is no appeal preferred.
3. The facts of the case are as follows:-The Deceased Dr.Saravanan (D1) and the Deceased Kasturi (D2) are husband and wife and the Deceased Anbarasi is the maidservant of D1 and D2. The Deceased 1 and 2 are not having issues. They are residing in their own house. Deceased Dr.Saravanan was a retired Chairman of Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals. Deceased Kasthuri is the house-wife. Admittedly, they were having huge wealth as well as foreign currencies. The deceased Dr.Saravanan whenever used to go out would usually call Sathish-A5 who died by committing suicide subsequent to the occurrence, as a spare driver to avail him whenever they were going to trip. While being so, as per the case of the prosecution three conspiracies were hatched between A1 to A5, one at 10.30 a.m. on 17.11.2008 another conspiracy at 9.30 a.m. on 18.11.2008 and the last one at 3.30 p.m. on 19.11.2008. As per the case of the prosecution on the midnight of 18.11.2008 near Porur lake under a bridge A1 to A4 hatched a conspiracy in which they arrived at a decision that A1, A2, and A5-Satish would go into the house of deceased Dr.Saravanan. The above conversation was overheard by P.W.3-Sathivel, P.W.7-Vikki @ Alagar Raja. The further case of the prosecution is that P.W.8-Suresh overheard the conversations on three successive days, 17th to 19th November 2008 A1, A2 and Satish-A5 had in Sasi Cabs. Under these backdrops now we can switch over to the occurrence.
4. P.W.1-Unnikrishnan was working as Selection Grade Assistant in the Office of the Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals Department. He got employment only at the influence of the deceased Dr.Saravanan. As usual on 19.11.2008, he attended the house of the deceased Dr.Saravanan at 5.30 a.m. and after finishing hi
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.