M.VENUGOPAL
Thiyagu @ Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
State, rep. by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
1. The Appellant/A.1 has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal as against the conviction and sentence dated 30/11/2005 in S.C.No.174 of 2005 passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore.
2. It comes to be known that the Appellant/A.1 viz., Thiyagu @ Thiyagarajan and the Second Accused Karu @ Nagarajan were apprehended while the Third Accused Vellian @ Jabarulla was absconding and as such the trial Court in its Common Judgment in S.C.No.174 of 2005 and S.C.No.219 of 2005 dated 30/11/2005 had stated that the Original P.R.C was committed earlier (viz., P.R.C.No.26 of 2004) and later, P.R.C.No.19 of 2005 was committed at a later stage.
3. The trial Court while delivering the Common Judgment in S.C.No.174 of 2005 and S.C.No.219 of 2005 (committed on 28/4/2005 and on 7/7/2005 in P.R.C.No.26 of 2004 and 19 of 2015) found the Appellant/First Accused (in Crl.a.No.24 of 2006) guilty and in respect of an offence under Section 392 r/w. Section 397 of Indian Penal Code and was awarded with the punishment of seven years Rigorous Imprisonment and was also directed to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, he was dir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.