S.MANIKUMAR
V. Selvi – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, Muthur – Respondent
1. The petitioner, who has constructed a house in Pappini Village, Kangeyam Taluk and assigned Door No.2/181 by the Pappini Panchayat Union, and assessed property tax, has made an application on 24.03.2012 for electricity service connection. After scrutinizing the application, the Assistant Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Muthur, Tiruppur District, the 1st respondent vide letter dated 11.05.2012, has directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.28,780/-. The said sum has been paid on 19.05.2012. Pursuant to the same, the 1st respondent has started the work to provide service connection. When they were about to carry out the lines through the posts, the Assistant Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Muthur, Tiruppur District, the 1st respondent herein, vide letter dated 06.10.2012 has informed the petitioner that, one Minor @ T.Palanisamy, the President of Pappini Panchayat Union, the 2nd respondent herein has raised objections for erection of the posts, in front of Periyanayagi Amman Temple. He has also stated that erection of posts and electricity supply would cause hindrance, while constructing a mandapam. Alongwith the communication dated 06.10.2012
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.