SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 859

G.Rajasuria
Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
Nallathambi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Valliappan, Advocate for Appellants.
N. Manoharan, Advocate for Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This Second Appeal is filed by the Defendants, animadverting upon the Judgment and Decree dated 26.4.2004 passed by the Subordinate Court, Sankari, reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2003 passed by the District Munsif Court, Sankari, in O.S. No. 131 of 2002, which was one for permanent injunction.

2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the Trial Court.

3. The epitome and the long and short of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Second Appeal would run thus:

(i) The Respondent/Plaintiff herein-Nallathambi filed the Suit seeking permanent injunction in respect of the house property described in the schedule of the Plaint.

(ii) The Appellants/Defendants filed the Written Statement resisting the Suit.

(iii) Whereupon issues were framed. Up went the trial, during which, the Plaintiff examined himself as PW1 along with one Solomon as PW2 & Exs.A1 to A7 were marked on his side. On the Defendants' side one Chellammal was examined as DW1 along with Madhu as PW2 and Exs.B1 to B21 were marked on their side. Ex.11 was marked as Court document.

(iv) Ultimately






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top