SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 2925

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU
G. Kesavan – Appellant
Versus
B. C. Raman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.Ramesh for Mr. M.A.Gouthaman
Mr. V.Bhiman

ORDER

The petitioner is the second plaintiff in a suit for specific performance. He is aggrieved against the order of the court below in dismissing his application filed under sections 148 and 151 C.P.C. seeking extension of time to deposit the sale consideration as per the decree passed in the said suit.

2. Short facts of the case are as follows:

The petitioner's father filed O.S.No.177 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Krishnagiri against the respondent herein seeking for decree of specific performance based on an agreement of re-conveyance. It is his contention that he sold the suit property to the respondent herein on 11.09.1990 for a sum of Rs.1,51,900/- and on the same day, both parties entered into an agreement of re-conveyance agreeing to re-convey the suit property to the plaintiff within a period of 10 years on receiving the same sale consideration. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioner's father/original plaintiff died and consequently, the petitioner herein was arrayed as the second plaintiff in I.A.No.142/2003 dated 07.03.2003. The defendant/respondent herein remained exparte and the trial court by judgment and decree dated 28.08.2003 decreed the suit thereby


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top