P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
C. Angulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
P. Srinivasan – Respondent
1. The judgment debtor in O.S.No.6886 of 2005 on the file of the XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is the petitioner in the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The decree passed in the above said suit is one for recovery of money and it is also an ex parte decree passed on 10.11.2005. For executing the decree and realizing the decree amount, the respondent herein/decree holder initiated execution proceedings in E.P.No.4392 of 2011 on the file of the Executing Court, namely the Court of the X Assistant Judge,. City Civil Court, Chennai praying for the attachment of the property described in the schedule provided to the execution petition and sale of the same on the ground that the said property belongs to the revision petitioner/judgment debtor. The Revision Petitioner/Judgment Debtor, after receiving notice in the Execution Petition, resisted the Execution Petition contending that the property sought to be attached, though owned by the revision petitioner/judgment debtor, was sold to a third party even before the passing of the decree and that hence, the said property is not available for attachment in execution of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.