SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 4101

High Court of Judicature at Madras
S. RAJESWARAN & P.N. PRAKASH, JJ.
K. Ramaraj
Versus
State By Inspector of Police CBCID, Chennai
Criminal Appeal No. 301 of 2012
Decided On : 12-12-2013

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:A. Natarajan, Senior Counsel for R. Gopinath, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Shanmugavelayutham, Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:

The appellant, an ex-serviceman, was convicted for the murder of a 13-year-old boy, Dilshan, who was picking almonds from trees near the appellant's residence. The appellant appealed the conviction, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he had caused Dilshan's death, that the rifle used in the shooting was not properly identified, and that he had not been given a fair trial. The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the prosecution had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant had shot and killed Dilshan, that the rifle used in the shooting was properly identified, and that the appellant had been given a fair trial.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, an ex-serviceman, was convicted for the murder of a 13-year-old boy, Dilshan, who was picking almonds from trees near the appellant's residence. The prosecution's case was that the appellant had shot Dilshan with a rifle, causing his death. The appellant denied the charges, claiming that he had not been at home at the time of the shooting and that the rifle used in the shooting was not his.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the prosecution had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant had shot and killed Dilshan, that the rifle used in the shooting was properly identified, and that the appellant had been given a fair trial. The Court found that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was credible and reliable, and that the appellant's alibi was not supported by the evidence. The Court also found that the rifle used in the shooting had been properly identified by the ballistics experts, and that the appellant had been given a fair trial.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant had shot and killed Dilshan. 2. Whether the rifle used in the shooting was properly identified. 3. Whether the appellant had been given a fair trial.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The prosecution had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant had shot and killed Dilshan. The evidence of the prosecution witnesses was credible and reliable, and the appellant's alibi was not supported by the evidence. 2. The rifle used in the shooting had been properly identified by the ballistics experts. 3. The appellant had been given a fair trial.

Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the conviction and sentences imposed by the trial court.

Judgment

P.N. Prakash, J.

1. Adam ate the forbidden apple and he was expelled from Heaven. Dilshan, a lad of 13, yearned for almonds and got expelled from Earth!!

2. The sole accused Lt.Col.Ramaraj was tried for offences u/s 302, 201 r/w 302 IPC and u/s 3 r/w 25(1-B)(a), 27, 25(I-B)(h) of Arms Act in S.C.No.339 of 2011 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-5, Chennai and convicted for the said offences by judgment dated 20.04.2012 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.50,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment of six months for the offence u/s 302 IPC; one year simple imprisonment and also pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default three months simple imprisonment for the offence u/s 3 r/w 25(1-B)(a) of the Indian Arms Act, 1959; three years simple imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence u/s 27 of the Arms Act, 1959; and one year simple imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence u/s 25(1-B)(h) of the Arms Act. Out of the total fine amount of Rs.60,000/-, a sum of Rs.50,000/- was directed to be paid as compensation u/s 357 Cr.P.C. to P.W.1., the unfortunate mother of Dilshan.

3. It is the case of the prosecution that the appellant, an Ex-Serviceman, lived in Door No.11/4, OEG Officers Enclave, Flag Staff House Road, Fort St.George, Chennai, though he retired from service on 30.04.2011, as he was permitted to occupy the house for a period of three months thereafter. The Army men’s enclave is abound with fruit bearing trees, which attracts the urchins who live across the road in the hutments called ‘Indira Nagar Colony’. At around 1.30 p.m. on 03.07.2011, a Sunday, Dilshan and three of his friends Sanjay [P.W.2], Praveen [P.W.3] and Vignesh [P.W.7] ventured into the Army men’s enclave to hunt for almonds. The lads were testing their marksmanship by flinging stones at their targets (Mangoes and Almonds). When they suddenly heard a bang, Sanjay [P.W.2], Praveen [P.W.3] and Vignesh [P.W.7] saw Dilshan falling on the ground and they took to heels. They went to their colony and informed Kalaivani [P.W.1], the mother of Dilshan about the mishap that occurred to Dilshan. It is a bone of contention as to what exactly the children told P.W.1. Nevertheless, P.W.1 and other elders in the colony went over to the enclave and found Dilshan lying inside the compound with bleeding injuries on his head. P.W.1, P.W.9 and others immediately took Dilshan by an autorickshaw to the nearby Government General Hospital, where Dr.C.Sasidharan [P.W.30] who was the duty Doctor in the emergency ward, saw the child unconscious at 1.45 p.m. In the Accident Register [Ex.P14], P.W.30 has entered:

“Alleged H/o fall from tree at 1.30 p.m. near kodimaraisalai, Old Fort Officers quarters.”

He has noticed two head injuries, one on the left temple and the other on the right temple. He admitted him as an inpatient in the hospital and further treatment was taken over by Dr.Sahayam [P.W.31]. The boy was unconscious and so P.W.31 requisitioned the services of a Neuro surgeon and CT scan was taken on his advice. CT Scan disclosed an injury in the brain. While the doctors were trying to give him the best possible treatment, the child succumbed to injuries at 5.20 p.m. on 03.07.2011 and the Death Intimation [Ex.P.15] was sent to the police. In the meantime, news that Dilshan was hurt because of firing from inside the Army men’s compound excited the hut dwellers who started a siege of the army compound. Hence, the army authorities also started enquiries realising that something had gone wrong in their campus. Muthuraj, Inspector of Police, B3 Fort Police Station [P.W.53] took up the investigation of the case. He went to the hospital and obtained a complaint [Ex.P1] from P.W.1 and he returned to the B3 Police Station at 2.30 p.m. and registered a case in B3 Fort Police Station,

































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top