Back
2014 Supreme(Mad) 415
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. JAICHANDREN, J.
M/s. Srinivasa Enterprises, rep. By its Managing Partner N.D.J. Renganath
Versus
M/s. Standard Chartered Bank, rep. By its Chairman & Managing Director & Others
C.S. No. 430 of 2011
Decided on: 21-02-2014
Advocate Appeared
For the Plaintiff:M/s. AL. Ganthimathi, Advocate.
For the Defendants:D1, D2, D4 to D6, V. Jayachandran, Advocate.
Enforcement of settlement through mediation as a basis for disposing of a civil suit and passing a decree.
Headnote:
Mediation Agreement - Settlement of Civil Suit - The court disposed of the civil suit based on the settlement reached between the parties through a mediation agreement, and a decree was passed in terms of the agreement.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff filed a civil suit seeking damages and a permanent injunction against the defendants. The matter was referred for mediation, and the parties reached a settlement as per the mediation agreement.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the civil suit based on the settlement reached through mediation. A decree was passed in terms of the mediation agreement, and the original documents filed by the plaintiff were to be returned. No costs were awarded.
Issues: Settlement through mediation, terms of mediation agreement, disposal of civil suit.
Ratio Decidendi: The court recognized and enforced the settlement reached between the parties through mediation, leading to the disposal of the civil suit and the passing of a decree in terms of the mediation agreement.
Final Decision: The civil suit was disposed of, and a decree was passed in terms of the mediation agreement. The plaintiff was entitled to a refund of the entire court fee, and no costs were awarded.
Based on the provided legal document, the key points relevant to your query are as follows:
-
The civil suit was initially disposed of through a settlement reached via a mediation agreement, which was recorded and resulted in a decree (!) .
-
It is noted that all three defendants had set ex parte, meaning they did not participate in the proceedings at some stage. However, D1 later set aside the ex parte order, which implies D1 took steps to participate or re-enter the proceedings after initially being absent (!) , (!) .
-
D1 entered into a mediation agreement, which was signed by the parties and their respective counsel, and this agreement was ultimately approved by the court, leading to a decree (!) – (!) .
-
The court’s final order was to dispose of the suit based on the mediation agreement, and the decree passed was in terms of that agreement (!) .
-
Generally, a decree passed on the basis of a settlement or mediation agreement is binding on the parties who participated in the process and signed the agreement. However, the enforceability of such a decree against other defendants who were set ex parte and did not participate in the mediation or the subsequent proceedings may depend on whether they were properly served, whether they were parties to the settlement, and whether the court explicitly extended the decree’s binding effect to all defendants.
-
Since the other defendants were set ex parte and did not participate in the mediation or the court proceedings after setting ex parte, the decree primarily binds only those parties who actively participated and signed the mediation agreement, i.e., D1.
-
The fact that D1 set aside the ex parte order and entered into a mediation agreement does not automatically bind the other defendants who remained ex parte, unless the court specifically included them in the decree or the settlement explicitly extended to all defendants.
Conclusion: The decree based on the mediation agreement is primarily binding on D1, who participated in and signed the agreement. The other defendants who remained ex parte are generally not bound by the decree unless the court explicitly directed that the decree or settlement would be binding on all defendants, including those who did not participate. The court’s order and the terms of the mediation agreement suggest that the decree was passed in terms of the settlement between the parties who participated, which likely does not automatically extend to the ex parte defendants.
Recommendation: To determine the binding effect on the ex parte defendants conclusively, one should review the specific court order and the decree to see if it explicitly states that it is binding on all defendants or only those who participated in the mediation.
1. This Civil Suit has been filed praying to pass a judgment and decree directing the defendants to jointly and severally pay the plaintiff, a sum of Rs.One Crore, together with interest at the rate of 24% per annum, from the date of the plaint, till the date of actual realization, towards damages, and further to grant a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from demanding any amount, as due from the plaintiff, in respect of its Loan Account No.242616, with defendants 1 to 3, said to have been assigned in favour of defendants 4 and 5 and from re-possessing the Maruti Esteem Car, bearing Registration No.TN 07 F 6939.
2. The matter was referred for mediation to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, by the order of this Court, dated 17.7.2013.
3. A communication, dated 17.2.2014, of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, has been received, enclosing a copy of the Mediation Report, dated 31.1.2014, stating that the matter has been settled between the parties concerned, as per the terms cited in the Mediation Agreement, dated 31.1.2014.
4. As the parties have arrived at a settlement, in terms of the Mediation Agreement, dated 31.1.2014, this Civil Suit is listed for passing orders.
5. The Mediation Agreement, dated 31.1.2014, signed by the parties, as well as their respective counsels, reads as follows:-
"Both sides, out of their own volition and without any pressure or coercion from any side have agreed as follows:
1. The Defendants have paid a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) by way of Demand Draft bearing No.581490, dated 29.01.2014 in the name of the Plaintiff towards full and final settlement and the Plaintiff acknowledges the receipt of the same.
2. The Defendant has also tendered an unconditional apology letter to the Plaintiff.
3. Both parties agrees that they have no further claim against each other with regards to the above suit."
6. In terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, which is recorded under the Mediation Agreement, dated 31.1.2014, this Civil Suit is disposed of. There shall be a Decree, in terms of the Mediation Agreement, dated 31.1.2014. The terms of the Mediation Agreement, dated 31.1.2014, shall form part of the record. No costs. All the connected Applications are closed. The original documents filed by the plaintiff, in the Suit, shall be returned to it. The plaintiff is also entitled to refund of the entire court fee.
