PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent
Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J.
1. The above petition is filed by one Vasantha Ammal, who is the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance, seeking for extension of time to comply with the condition as stipulated in the judgment of this Court dated 28.8.2000 passed in A.S. No. 789 of 1987.
2. The brief facts relevant are as follows:-
The first respondent herein, who is the defendant agreed to sell the property for total consideration of Rs.38,500/- vide agreement dated 06.3.1985. Out of the sale consideration, the first respondent herein had received Rs.5000/- as advance and the balance was agreed to be paid within a month from the date of agreement within which time the sale deed should be executed by the first respondent. On 05.4.1985, the first respondent herein received a further sum of Rs.2000/- from the plaintiff and time for performance was extended by another month by mutual consent. As the first respondent was evading execution of the sale agreement, the petitioner herein filed O.S. No. 119 of 1985 on the file of Subordinate Court, Villupuram, for specific performance of the contract and the suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff against which the first respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.