SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 335

S.NAGAMUTHU
P. Sathish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioner:A.V. Arun, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

S. Nagamuthu. J.

1. The salutary concept of “Fair Trial” which has received recognition under the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948” and guarantee under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, has received wider interpretation at the hands of the Hon'ble Supreme Court so as to include fair investigation of a crime as well. Thus, prompt registration of a case by a competent police officer followed by swift investigation resulting in a quick final report are all concomitants of a fair trial. To be fair to the victim, fair to the accused and fair to the society at large are the Constitutional obligations of the police. If there is any deviance, it is likely to result in failure of justice. That is the reason why a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of U.P. and Others reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 has issued as many as eight directions in the matter of registration of a case. But, the instant case illustrates as to how an information, promptly launched, has taken a long journey, changing many hands and at last landed in the hands of a Sub-Inspector of Police for investigation after ten months of its launching. Now let us t










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top