R.MAHADEVAN
R. Murali – Appellant
Versus
R. Shyamala – Respondent
1. Against the order passed in W.C.No.280 of 2009 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II (Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation-II), Chennai-600006, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.
2. A claim of Rs.6,00,000/- under the Workmen Compensation Act was made and the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II awarded a compensation of Rs.3,18,773/-. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been preferred.
3. The two substantial question of laws raised before this Hon’ble Court are
"1. Whether the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II ought to have fixed the loss of earning capacity at 100% ?
2. Whether the appellant is entitled to interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of accident under Sec 4A(3) of the W.C. Act ?"
4. The appellant a driver by profession was the claimant before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II. While driving the Lorry (MIX Concrete) with Registration No TN-20-AR-0515 owned by the first respondent, on the night of 21.01.2009, he met with an accident and as a result, sustained serious injuries. He claimed compensation for having lost 100% earning capacity in view of the nature of injury and disability, along with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.