SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 4177

R.MAHADEVAN
R. Murali – Appellant
Versus
R. Shyamala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:U.M. Ravichandiran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, No Appearance, R2, C. Paranthaman, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. Against the order passed in W.C.No.280 of 2009 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II (Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation-II), Chennai-600006, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.

2. A claim of Rs.6,00,000/- under the Workmen Compensation Act was made and the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II awarded a compensation of Rs.3,18,773/-. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been preferred.

3. The two substantial question of laws raised before this Hon’ble Court are

"1. Whether the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II ought to have fixed the loss of earning capacity at 100% ?

2. Whether the appellant is entitled to interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of accident under Sec 4A(3) of the W.C. Act ?"

4. The appellant a driver by profession was the claimant before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II. While driving the Lorry (MIX Concrete) with Registration No TN-20-AR-0515 owned by the first respondent, on the night of 21.01.2009, he met with an accident and as a result, sustained serious injuries. He claimed compensation for having lost 100% earning capacity in view of the nature of injury and disability, along with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the d


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top