SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 151

R.KARUPPIAH
Sekar – Appellant
Versus
Ramadas – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Sounther, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Shivakumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant who is the defendant in the suit filed this second appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 23.01.2004 made in A.S.No.85 of 2003 and on the file of Principal Sub-Court, Mayiladudurai, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 10.07.2002 made in O.S.No.721 of 1998 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Mayiladudurai.

2. For the sake of convenience, the defendant in the suit is referred as appellant and the plaintiff in the suit is referred as respondent hereafter.

3. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for delivery of possession and for future profits. Briefly the case of the respondent is that the suit property belongs to the respondent. The appellant agreed to purchase the respondent's property and also the property of his brother namely S.Varadarajan's property on 14.04.1996 for sale consideration of Rs.1,17,000/- rendered in an agreement and taken possession of the properties on 14.04.1996 itself. The appellant paid a sum of Rs.20,000/- on 23.09.1996 and Rs.40,000/- on 20.02.1997 as part of sale consideration. Since the appellant has not complied with first condition, the respondent issued a legal notice on 28.02.1997 calling upon the appellan






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top