SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Mad) 76

S.RAMACHANDRA IYER
Shanmugham – Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayana Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
R. V. Seshadri, for Petitioners.
E. S. Raja, for Respondent.

ORDER

These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of orders passed in execution of an order for eviction passed under the provisions of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. The tenants are the petitioners before me. In H.R.C. No. 2508 of 1961 the landlord of the premises now in questions, one Asgar Ali Dhala sought to evict the petitioners on the ground that the building required immediate demolition and reconstruction. While filing the application, he gave the undertaking required of him by section 14 (2) (b) of the Act stating that the work of demolition of the material portion of the building would be substantially commenced by him not later than one month and would be completed before the expiry of three months from the date he recovers possession of the entire building. The tenants agreed to give vacant possession and accordingly an order by consent was passed by which the tenants were directed to deliver possession to the landlord by 31st December, 1962. Even before that date arrived, Asgar Ali sold the building to one Satyanarayana Prasad who is the respondent in these petitions. Satyanarayana taking advantage of the order procured by his predecessor-in-title





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top