RAMA RAO
G. Venkatanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Kurupati Lakmi Devi – Respondent
This revision petition is against the order appointing a Commissioner-Doctor preferably Civil Surgeon rank and M.D. for scientific investigation of the petitioner in the main O.P. to know whether he is impotent or not and whether he is able to consummate the marriage. O.P. No. 93 of 1979 was filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights. The contention of the wife is that the husband is impotent and during the pendency of the original petition the wife filed an interlocutory application for the appointment of a Commissioner. In the counter-affidavit the allegation of impotency is denied and it is stated that the question of examination by competent Doctor does not arise. The Court below held that if the respondent is not suffering from any defect no harm would be caused to him if he is sent for medical examination and in this view the application is allowed
2. In Birendra Kumar v. Hemalata Biswas Birendra Kumar v. Hemalata Biswas A.I.R. 1921 Cal. 459 a suit was filed by husband under the India Divorce Act to declare the marriage on two grounds namely the wife was impotent and the consent was obtained by fraud. It is also alleged that the wife was suffering from in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.