SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 3591

K.B.K.VASUKI
Jayachandran – Appellant
Versus
Manjula – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sarath Chander, for Petitioner

ORDER

1. The husband/petitioner herein filed this criminal revision against the issuance of “Distress warrant” against him for his failure to appear before the Court to answer the claim for recovery of maintenance of Rs. 60,000/- relating to the period from 8.8.2007 to 8.8.2008.

2. The petition was filed by the wife under Section 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for directing the respondent/husband to clear all the arrears to the tune of Rs. 60,000/- at the rate of Rs. 5,000/-p.m. for 12 months. Inspite of due summons, the husband failed to appear before the Court concerned, which compelled the Court to set him ex-parte and to allow the petition and to issue a “Distress Warrant” through the Additional Educational Officer, Tirupathur.

3. The said order was challenged herein on the ground that the proper relief to be granted under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code is, in the event of failure of the husband to pay maintenance arrears, to issue “Distraint Warrant” as provided under Sections 421 and 431 of the Code either for attachment and sale of any movable property belonging to the petitioner or to issue warrant to the Collector of the District, authorising him to realise








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top