SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 1009

S.PALANIVELU
Hamsaveni – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tindivanam – Respondent


ORDER

The following is the graphical narration of the prosecution case:

1.(a) P.W.1 and 1st accused are belonging to Nolambur village. They were loving each other for two years prior to the date of occurrence. On 10.11.2003 at about 8.00 p.m. when nobody else in the house of P.W.1, 1st accused got entry into the house and attempted to have sexual relationship with her. When she refused, he stuffed her mouth with cloth and forcibly had sexual intercourse. She did not inform the occurrence to anybody as he promised to marry her. Subsequently, on various occasions he had sexual intercourse with her by obtaining her consent through false representations that he would marry her. She became pregnant. After that, so many occasions she has asked him to marry her for which he told that only after terminating foetus he will marry her. She informed her parents about the happenings. Thereafter, a panchayat was conducted wherein the 1st accused agreed to marry her. But later on he refused to marry her. On 21.5.2004 at about 10.00 a.m., accused 1 to 4 restrained P.W.1, caught hold of her hair and stamped on her stomach by legs.

1.(b) Narrating the above said allegations P.W.1 gave complaint with t














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top