PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Kuruvamani – Appellant
Versus
A. Muthu – Respondent
1. This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 29/4/2008 passed in A.S.No.394 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul as reversing the judgment and decree dated 16/3/2000 passed in O.S.No.390 of 1997 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul.
2. The plaintiffs are the appellants in the above Second Appeal.
3. The suit is filed for
(i). declaration that the second item of 'B' schedule property belonged to the first plaintiff and for consequential injunction;
(ii). declaration that the second item of 'C' Schedule property belonged to the second plaintiff and for consequential injunction
(iii). declaration that the second item of 'D' Schedule property belonged to the third plaintiff and for consequential injunction.
(iv). declaration that the second item of 'E' schedule property belonged to the plaintiffs and 'F' schedule property belonged to the fourth plaintiff and for consequential injunction.
4. For an easy appreciation of facts, the geneology is shown below:-
5. The case of the plaintiffs is that the suit properties originally belonged to the great grand father of the first plaintiff viz., one Mutha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.