V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Kal Cables Pvt. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting – Respondent
1. The petitioner is a Multi System Operator, within the meaning of Rule 2(c) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. They are engaged in the business of securing signals from Television Channels and distributing them through Cable Operators, to the end users. The petitioner was granted permission to operate as Multi System Operator, first in the city of Chennai, in the area notified under Section 4-A of Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 read with Rule 11(2) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994, by an order dated 30.09.2006 issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of the Government of India. The permission was, as seen from the order dated 30.09.2006, granted provisionally and was made subject to security clearance by the Ministry of Home Affairs. The permission was also subject to adherence to certain terms and conditions stipulated in the order itself. The order granting permission also made it clear that the Ministry was entitled to revoke or suspend or terminate/cancel the permission granted forthwith and without any advance notice, if it was found that the petitioner had provided wrong/misleading/incorrect information in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.