M.JAICHANDREN, M.VENUGOPAL
Inspector General of Registration – Appellant
Versus
K. P. Kadar Hussain – Respondent
M. Venugopal, J.
1. The Appellants/Respondents have preferred the instant W.A.Nos.1436 & 1437 of 2013 as against the common order, dated 08.01.2013, in W.P.Nos.29638 & 29799 of 2012 passed by the Learned Single Judge, in allowing the Writ Petitions.
2. The Appellants/Respondents have filed the present W.A.Nos. 1770 to 1773 of 2013, as against the common order dated 23.04.2013, in W.P.Nos.9258 to 9261 of 2013, passed by the Learned Single Judge, in allowing the Writ Petitions.
3. The Appellant has focussed the W.A.Nos.1921 & 1922 of 2013, as against the common order, dated 27.03.2013, in W.P.Nos.3756 & 3757 of 2013, passed by the Learned Single Judge, in directing the Respondent therein to consider the representations of the Petitioners dated 17.09.2012 and 04.10.2012 for refund of excess stamp duty and registration charges etc.
4. The Appellants have projected the present W.A.No.2026 of 2013, as against the order, dated 21.03.2013, in W.P.No.5264 of 2013, passed by the Learned Single Judge, in directing the Respondent therein to return the document in question.
5. According to the Learned Advocate General for the Appellants, the orders of the Learned Single Judges are cont
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.