M.VENUGOPAL
T. Velnadar – Appellant
Versus
P. Ayyanathan – Respondent
1. These Criminal Appeals have been preferred by the Appellant/Complainant as against the Judgment dated 14.9.2011 in C.C.Nos.2301, 2302 and 2304 of 2001 passed by the Learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
2. The Learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, while passing the impugned Judgments in C.C.Nos.2301, 2302 and 2304 of 2001, on 14.09.2011, had clearly held that the Appellant/Complainant had miserably failed to prove his cases against the Respondent/Accused and ultimately found him not guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him under Section 255 (1) of Cr.P.C. Appellant's Contentions:
3. According to the Learned Counsel for the Appellant/ Complainant, the trial Court had committed an error, in acquitting the accused in three Calender Cases, by not appreciating the material evidences projected by the Appellant/ Complainant.
4. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant vehemently submits that the Respondent/Accused impliedly accepting the money transaction between him and the Appellant/Complainant and further, he issued 3 cheques viz., 1.Cheque No.564482 dated 20.07.2000, 2.Cheque No.564483 dated 16.08.2000 and 3.Ch
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.