SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 2079

High Court of Judicature at Madras
M. VENUGOPAL, J.
D. Balu
Versus
State by Deputy Superintendent of Police Vigilance & Anti Corruption Salem
Crl.R.C.No.623 of 2014
Decided On : 21-07-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:A. Nagarathinam, Advocate.
For the Respondent: A.N. Thambidurai, Additional Public Prosecutor.

The court can dismiss a case as withdrawn based on the request of the petitioner's counsel.

Headnote:

Withdrawal - Criminal Revision Case - The court dismissed the Criminal Revision Case as withdrawn based on the endorsement made by the Petitioner's Counsel.

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioner's Counsel requested to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the Criminal Revision Case as withdrawn.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi:

Final Decision: The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Judgment :

1. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused has made an endorsement in the Criminal Revision Case to the effect that he may be permitted to withdraw this Revision.

2. Recording the said fact and the endorsement so made, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top