1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner/A10.

2. According to the learned counsel for the Petitioner/A10, the petitioner's name was inadvertently typed as 'B.Ramachandran' instead of 'B.Ramachandra', in the judgment in C.C.No.1 of 2003 on the file of the learned IX Additional Special Judge for CBI cases at Chennai. Further, it comes to be known that the petitioner filed memo dated 16.07.2014, before the trial Court for correction of his name in the certified copy of the judgment dated 08.01.2014. But the said memo was returned by the trial Court, stating that the material part of records in C.C.No.1 of 2003 was sent to Hon'ble High Court, Madras for consideration of Crl.A.Nos.31, 43, 48, 49, 55, 57 and 68 of 2014. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the Petitioner/A10, brings it to the notice of this Court that the aforesaid criminal appeals were admitted by this Court.

3. The relief sought for by the Petitioner/A10, in the present Criminal Original Petition is that this Court may pass an order directing the Registry to correct the name of the Petitioner/A10 in the judgment of the trial Court in C.C.No.1 of 2003 dated 08.01.2014 as 'B.Ramachandra' instead