High Court of Judicature at Madras
D. HARIPARANTHAMAN, J.
A. Manoharan & Another
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government & Others
W.P. Nos. 24235 & 24236 of 2013 & M.P. No. 1 of 2013
Decided On: 18-06-2014
Pension Entitlement - Service Regularization - Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 Rule 11(2), Rule 11(4)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a former Social Forestry Worker, sought pension entitlement based on 50% of his service on daily wages along with regular service. The respondents denied his request, citing Rule 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was entitled to count 50% of his service on daily wages basis for pension, as per Rule 11(2) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. The court also noted the arbitrary nature of Rule 11(4) and its violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Issues: Entitlement to pension based on daily wages service, interpretation of Rule 11(2) and Rule 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, and the arbitrary nature of Rule 11(4).
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to count 50% of his service on daily wages basis for pension, and that Rule 11(4) was arbitrary and violated Article 14 of the Constitution.
Final Decision: The impugned order denying the petitioner's pension entitlement was quashed, and the respondents were directed to count half of the petitioner's service before his absorption for the purpose of pension, to be completed within three months.
1. Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner was initially engaged as Social Forestry Worker in the Forest Department from 17.02.1983 onwards. He was continued in service on daily wages basis. The service was a continuous one. He was not given time scale of pay. He was absorbed into regular service as Watcher with effect from 12.03.2008, after he rendered 25 years of daily wages service and thereafter, he was granted time scale of pay. He retired from service on 30.04.2013 on reaching the age of superannuation. Since the regular service rendered by him falls short of 10 years, he was not paid pension.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that 50 % of service on daily wages basis shall be taken into account along with his regular service for the purpose of pension. He placed reliance on Rule 11(2) of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. But his request to grant pension by counting 50% of service on daily wages basis was declined by the impugned order dated 06.07.2013. Thus, he was denied pension, though he rendered in total a long service of 30 years before retirement. Hence, this writ petition.
4. Therefore, the question that falls for consideration is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to count 50% of his services rendered on daily wages basis along with regular service for the purpose of pension, under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.
5. The case of the respondents is that half of the service rendered by the petitioner on daily wages basis could not be counted for the purpose of pension, since he was absorbed into regular service after 01.04.2013. According to the respondents, only if the absorption of daily wages employee took place prior to 01.04.2003, half of the service rendered on daily wages basis could be counted along with regular service. In this regard, the respondents have placed reliance on Rule 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules.
6. In the Forest Department, the sanctioned strength of the entry level posts, namely, Forest Guard and Mali, was only 1328 and 155 respectively. But, a very large contingent of employees were required to protect the vast forest area. Thus, thousands of daily wages employees, like the petitioner, were employed to meet the said situation. They continued as daily wages employees for decades. A seniority list of daily wages employees was prepared containing 5497 persons, as per G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forests Department, dated 08.03.1999 and the regular vacancies in Forest Guard / Mali were filled from the said seniority list. Since there were only 100-150 vacancies arose in those posts every year, thousands of daily wages employees were not regularized and they retired from service as daily wages employees, even after completion of 30 years of their service. Some died without their services were regularized.
7. While so, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.22, Personnel and Administrative Department, dated 28.02.2006, regularizing the service of daily wages employees/consolidated pay employees/honorarium employees on completion of 10 years of their services. Based on the said G.O.Ms.No.22, dated 28.02.2006, employees in various Departments of the Government were regularized on completion of 10 years of service and they were given monetary benefits also after ten years of service.
8. But, in the Forest Department, in view of G.O.Ms.No.64, dated 08.03.1999, the said G.O.Ms.No.22, P & AR Department, dated 28.02.2006, was not implemented. That is, the temporary employees similarly situated like the petitioner herein, about 5497 persons, mentioned in G.O.Ms.No.64, dated 08.03.1999, in the Forest Department were not regularized on completion of 10 years of service pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.22, dated 21.12.2006, when the benefit was extended to the daily wages employees of other Departments of the Tamil Nadu Government.
9. Hence, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.95, Environment and Forests (F2) Department, dated 07.08.2009, based on G.O.Ms.No.22, P & AR Department, dated 28.02.2006, and
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.