M.JAICHANDREN, M.VENUGOPAL
D. Ananthi – Appellant
Versus
K. Chandrasekaran – Respondent
M. Venugopal, J.
1. The Appellants/Applicants/Third Parties have preferred the instant O.S.A.No.129 of 2014 as against the order dated 09.04.2014 in A.No.5398 of 2013 in O.A.No.542 of 2013 in C.S.No.490 of 2013 passed by the Learned Single Judge.
The Appellants/Applicants/Third parties have filed the present O.S.A.No.143 of 2014 as against the order dated 09.04.2014 in A.No.5923 of 2013 in O.A.No.542 of 2013 in C.S.No.490 of 2013 passed by the Learned Single Judge.
2. The Learned Single Judge, while passing the Common Order dated 09.04.2014, in A.Nos.5398, 5923, 5924 and 6182 of 2013 in C.S.No.490 of 2013, has, inter alia, observed that '... So far as the applicants in A.No.5398 of 2013 is concerned, they have no locus standi to seek an order to implead them as parties at this stage, as they are neither necessary parties nor proper parties to the suit' and further, opined that 'if the impleading applications filed by the members of the union are allowed, it may be nothing, but opening the flood gate and one after another at any stage, simply by stating as member of the union, impleading application could be filed, with a view to stall the democratic process of conducting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.