V. Dhanapalan, J.

1. The petitioner is the wife of detenu. The detenu has been branded as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under order of the 2nd respondent passed in BDFGISSV No.878/2013 dated 02.09.2013

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:-

Sr.No. Police Station and Crime No. Sections of Law

1. E-3, Teynampet Police Station, Crime No.2367 of 2008 Sections 147, 148, 341, 326, 307 and 506(ii) IPC

2. S-10, Pallikaranai Police Station, Crime No.141 of 2012 Section 302 r/w 34 IPC

3. E-1, Mylapore Police Station Crime No.618 of 2013 Sections 379 IPC r/w 34 IPC

4. E-3, Teynampet Police Station Crime No.2379 of 2013 Section 392 IPC

The ground case alleged against the detenu is one registered on 23.08.2013 by the Inspector of Police, E-3, Teynampet Police Station in Crime No.2394 of 2013 for offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 336, 397 and 506(ii) IPC. Aggrieved by the order of detention, the present petition has been filed.

3. Though learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several other grounds to assail the order of detention, he has mainly focused his argument on the ground that there is a variation in translation of the r