V. Dhanapalan, J.

1. The petitioner is the mother of detenu. The detenu has been branded as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Memo No.987/BDFGISSV/2013, dated 13.09.2013.

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:-

Sl.No

Police Station and Crime

No. Sections of Law

1.

Ponneri P.S. Cr.No.294/2012 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 506(ii)

IPC r/w 307 & 436 IPC.

2.

Ponneri P.S. Cr.No.487/2012 399 IPC

3.

Ponneri P.S. Cr.No.691/2012 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC.

4.

Ponneri P.S. Cr.No.704/2012 457, 380 IPC.

The ground case alleged against the detenu is one registered on 28.08.2013 by the Inspector of Police, K-5 Peravallore Police Station in Crime No.1822/2013 for the offences under Sections 341, 392, 397, 336 and 506(ii) IPC.

3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several other grounds to assail the order of detention, he mainly focused his arguments on the ground that there is variation in translation of the remand extension order dated 12.09.2013 annexed in the booklet, which has deprived the detenu in making effective representation to the authorities concerned and