V. Dhanapalan, J.

1. The petitioner is the mother of the detenu. The detenu has been branded as a "Goonda" as contemplated under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under order of the 2nd respondent passed in No.1612/2013 dated 14.11.2013.

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:-

Sl.No. Police Station and Crime No. Sections of Law

1. P-6 Kodungaiyur Police Station, Crime No.1863 of 2012 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC

2. P-5 M.K.B. Nagar Police Station, Crime No.1484 of 2013 341, 294(b), 392 and 506(ii) IPC

The ground case alleged against the detenu is one registered on 27.10.2013 by the Inspector of Police, P-6 Kodungaiyur Police Station in Crime No.1802 of 2013 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 506(ii) IPC. Aggrieved by the order of detention, the present petition has been filed.

3. Amidst several grounds raised, learned counsel for the petitioner mainly focused his argument on the ground that there is variation in the translated version of the grounds of detention. Therefore, the subjective satisfaction arrived by the detaining authority is not well founded.

4. We have heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respo