V. Dhanapalan, J.

1. The petitioner is the father of the detenu. The detenu has been branded as a "Goonda" as contemplated under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under order of the 2nd respondent passed in Memo No.671/BDFGISSV/2013, dated 12.08.2013.

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:-

Sr.No. Police Station and Crime No. Sections of Law

1. M-3, Puzhal Police Station, Crime No.331 of 2013 379 IPC

2. M-1, Madhavaram Police Station, Crime No.1216 of 2013 392 IPC

3. M-1, Madhavaram Police Station, Crime No.1252 of 2013 397 IPC r/w. 395 IPC

The ground case alleged against the detenu is one registered on 24.07.2013 by the Inspector of Police, M-1, Madhavaram Police Station in Crime No.1259/2013 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 336, 392 r/w. 397 and 506(ii) IPC.

3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several other grounds to assail the order of detention, he mainly focused his arguments on the ground that there is variation in translation of the remand order dated 25.07.2013 annexed in the booklet, which has deprived the detenu in making effective representation to the authorities concerned and therefore, on this sole ground,