V.DHANAPALAN
Mani Alias Adhimoola Naicker – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Kancheepuram – Respondent
1. The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition for a direction to the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders on his representations dated 20.03.2012 and 01.11.2012 as per due process of law.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of this case are as follows:
2.1. The petitioner is a resident of Mangalam Village, Thirukalukkundram from 1973 onwards. His father was in possession of the property situated in Survey No.147/11B, which comes to an extent of 2.11 cents for more than two decades and after the lifetime of his father, the petitioner is enjoying peaceful possession of the said property till now. When the petitioner went to the office of the Tahsildar and made an application to furnish a copy of patta, he came to know that the 3rd respondent had mechanically issued patta in the name of the 4th respondent without conducting any enquiry and without summoning the petitioner for hearing, without considering the fact that the petitioner and his brother Sarangabani were in peaceful possession of the said property.
2.2. At that point of time, the petitioner and his brother Sarangabani gave a representation dated 02.04.2009 to the 2nd respondent, after the 3rd responden
P.R. Murlidharan v. Swami Dharmananda Theertha Padar reported in (2006) 4 SCC 501
Himmat Singh v. State of Haryana and Others
Vishwas Footwear Company Ltd. Vs. The District Collector and others reported in (2012) 1 MLJ 566
Rourkela Shramik Sangh v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. And Another
Steel Authority of India Ltd. V. National Union Waterfront Workers
Rourkela Shramik Sangh v. Steel Authority of India Ltd., and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.