SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 1625

G.M.AKBAR ALI
R. Vatsala – Appellant
Versus
R. Krishna Kumar – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
B. Dinesh Kumar, V. Balasubramanian, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. Suit for partition of the suit property by Metes and Bounds and hand over separate possession of the plaintiffs 1/6th share each in the Suit Schedule property; appoint an Advocate Commissioner to divide the Suit Schedule Property having metes and bounds and put the plaintiffs in possession of their respective 1/6th share in the Suit property; iii) directing the Advocate Commissioner to be appointed by this Court to ascertain the mesne Profits from the Suit Property and direct the defendants to pay the plaintiffs their respective 1/6th share until the plaintiffs 1/6th shares are delivered to them ; declare that the Partition Deed under Document No.867/2000 alleged to have been executed on 27.11.2000 to be null and void and declare that the Settlement Deed under Document No.455/2010 dated 10.2.2010 executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant is null and void.

2. The suit property is a land and building at New No.22, Old No.13, Manickeswari Road, Kilpauk, Chennai, measuring 7200 sq.ft in re-survey number 3130 of Purasawalkam Village. This property originally belonged to one Mr.Ramadas, the husband of the first plaintiff and the father of the plaintiffs 2 t












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top