V. Dhanapalan, J.

1. The petitioner is the brother of detenu. The detenu has been branded as a Goonda under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under order of the 1st respondent passed in Memo No. 961/BDFGISSV of 2013 dated 11.09.2013.

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:–

S. No. Police Station and Crime No. Sections of Law

1.

K-9, Thiru.Vi.Ka. Nagar Police Station, Crime No. 752 of 2013 Sections 302 and 201 IPC

2.

P-6, Kodungaiyur Police Station, Crime No. 1554 of 2013 Sections 341, 384 and 506(ii) IPC

The ground case alleged against the detenu is one registered on 05.09.2013 by the Inspector of Police, P-6, Kodungaiyur Police Station in Crime No. 1559 of 2013 for offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 363, 336, 427, 397, 307 and 506 (ii) IPC. Aggrieved by the order of detention, the present petition has been filed.

3. Though learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several other grounds to assail the order of detention, he has mainly focused his argument on the ground that though the detaining authority has stated about the remand of detenu in Crime No. 1554 of 2013, 2nd adverse case, the said material relied on by the detaining authority ha