V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Arockia Jeyabalan – Appellant
Versus
Regional Passport Officer – Respondent
1. The petitioner, who holds an Indian passport, but who works in Singapore for the past about ten years, has come up with the first writ petition, seeking the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to return his passport bearing No.J3497386 seized from him by the Inspector of Police. He has come up with the second writ petition, challenging a Look Out Notice issued by the Police to the Chief Immigration Officer of the Bureau of Immigration.
2. I have heard Mr. J. Pothiraj, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Haja Mohideen Gisthi, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the Passport Officer, Mrs. R. Maheswari, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the Department of Immigration, Mr. R. Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State and Mrs. C. Shyamala, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner's wife, who is the fourth respondent in the first writ petition.
3. The petitioner married the fourth respondent at Paramakkudi on 9.7.2009. Thereafter, both of them left for Singapore where the petitioner is employed. The petitioner's wife returned to India, for the delivery of her baby in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.