M.VENUGOPAL
Veena Ravindran – Appellant
Versus
State (Inspector of Police, C. B. I) – Respondent
1. The Petitioners/A2 to A4, have focussed the instant Criminal Original Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records in C.C.No.30 of 2004 on the file of the Learned 11th Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai.
Petitioners' Contentions:
2. According to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/A2 to A4, the charges framed against the Petitioners/A2-A4 are that in the year 2001, they had entered into a conspiracy with the 1st Accused/S.P.Damodaran to cheat Union Bank and in pursuance of the same obtained loans in excess of the limits sanctioned to them, that in the process, the relative sanction advice Ex.P6 in the Bank was forged, that payment vouchers Exs.P15 to P18 were also forged and that the Bank suffered wrongful loss to the tune of Rs.23 lakhs and resultantly the Petitioners/Accused have wrongfully gained. Accordingly, they were charged under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 467 r/w 471 IPC. As regards, A1/public servant is concerned, apart from the above charges, he is charged in respect of offences under Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Accused u
B.S.Joshi & Others Vs. State of Haryana & Another
G.V. Rao v. L.H.V. Prasad & Ors. [(2000) 3 SCC 693]
Monica Kumar (Dr.) vs. State of U.P.[4](2008) 8 SCC 781 : (2008) 3 SCC (Cri) 649)
Rajeshwar Tiwari vs. Nanda Kishore Roy[5] (2010) 8 SCC 442 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 915
Central Bureau of Investigation, SPE, SIU (X), New Delhi Vs. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Calcutta
CBI vs. A. Ravishanker Prasad [3] ((2009) 6 SCC 351 : (2009) 2 SCC (Cri) 1063)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.