PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Thangavel – Appellant
Versus
R. Maragatham – Respondent
1. The third defendant, in a suit for permanent injunction, has projected this instant Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 16.09.2005 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, in A.S. No. 58 of 2005 wherein and by which the judgment and decree dated 07.01.2005 made in O.S. No. 301 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore, was reversed allowing the First Appeal at the instance of the plaintiff.
2. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property situate in S. No. 116/1B1 in Veerakeralam Village, along with the other properties, originally belonged to the first defendant. Defendants 2 and 4 are first defendant's daughters while the third defendant is the husband of the second defendant. It is stated that when the first defendant decided to sell the properties, she gave a Power of Attorney dated 09.8.1999 in favour of the second defendant, who, also on the strength of the same, sold the property on 28.8.2000 in favour of the plaintiff and put her in possession. It is further contended by the plaintiff that when the sale was effected, the boundaries were demarcated with boundary stones and possession was given t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.