SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 3493

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
N. KIRUBAKARAN & S. VAIDYANATHAN, JJ.
Muthukrishnan
Versus
The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary & Others
W.P(MD) No.8457 of 2014
Decided on: 25-09-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S.M. Ananda Murugan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R5, R6, R9 to R13, K. Chellapandian, Add. Advocate General Assisted by Sathishkumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader, R14, K.K. Senthil Velan, Asst. Solicitor General, R16 to R17, Vijaykarthikeyan, R1 to R4, R7 & R8, Uthaman, R15, SanthaRam Natarajan, Advocates.

Headnote:

Fireworks - Prohibition of Chinese Crackers - Explosives Act, Explosive Substances Act - Summary: The court addressed the prohibition of illegal Chinese crackers under the Explosives Act and Explosive Substances Act. It highlighted the regulations governing the import, possession, and sale of explosives, emphasizing the dangers posed by unauthorized explosives and the need for strict enforcement. The court also emphasized the lack of coordination among government agencies and the need for a central agency to investigate the nationwide smuggling of Chinese crackers. The judgment directed the transfer of the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for further investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to enforce the prohibition of Chinese crackers and hand over the investigation to CBI due to the seizure of illegal Chinese crackers and the authorities' inaction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the seizure of Chinese crackers posed a serious threat to the fireworks industry and the safety of the public, emphasizing the lack of prompt action by the authorities and the need for a central agency to investigate the nationwide smuggling of Chinese crackers.

Issues: The issues included the unauthorized import and sale of Chinese crackers, the lack of prompt action by the authorities, and the need for a central agency to investigate the matter.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the unauthorized import of Chinese crackers posed a threat to public safety and the fireworks industry, emphasizing the need for strict enforcement of regulations and the lack of coordination among government agencies. It also emphasized the need for a central agency, CBI, to investigate the matter.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, directing the transfer of the case to the CBI for further investigation and reinvestigation, even if the investigation is over and the charge sheet is filed. The authorities were also directed to conduct periodic inspections, seize Chinese crackers, and ensure compliance with safety regulations in the fireworks industry.

Judgment

N. Kirubakaran, J.

1. “Fire work”, instead of lighting up the sky darkens the bright sky of Virudhunagar. The culprit fire work is prohibited illegal Chinese crackers. The authorities have to foresee the problems in advance and to take necessary steps to prevent unwanted and dangerous consequences/results and at least to act swiftly in case of any danger. Our country is thickly populated one, coming next to China. We are facing security problems not only externally, but also internally. At a time, when our enemies are bent upon destabilizing our country economically as well as security wise, we should be very careful to allow any foreigner as well as foreign materials with great caution and after proper verification. Are we cautious enough? The facts of the case would reflect the reality.

2. By way of this Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner wants a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 12, to strictly enforce the third respondent's circular in No.17 (10) 2007 Explosives, dated 05.03.2010 and further direct the respondents 2 to 11, seize all illegally imported explosives items (particularly Chinese crackers) and destroy the same as per the Explosive Act. The petitioner claiming himself to be a member of the Executive Committee of Adhi Thamilar Peravai states that he is involved in many social activities and also fighting for welfare of fire works employees. He would contend that out of 982 Fireworks Factories in India and 800 factories are running in and around Virudhunagar. About, 5 Lakhs of people are directly or indirectly depending upon the said industry for employment. Sivakasi is fulfilling 90% of all India demand and considerable portion of fireworks are also exported to foreign countries.

3. It is contended by the petitioner that on 14.05.2014, the Assistant District Magistrate (Tahsildar) Sivakasi inspected a sales Depot belonging to one Mr. Ganesh Babu, son of Soundara pandian, Periyandavar Colony, Sivakasi and found that he was possessing and selling the prohibited Chinese fireworks, which were said to have been purchased from a owner of fireworks, Sivakasi and the said fireworks were seized. However, the complaint was lodged only on 17.05.2014 and FIR was registered on the same date. Though police authorities were present there, they did not take any step as per Explosives Rules; The higher authorities, regarding the inspection and seizure of the Chinies crackers, should have been informed by the Assistant Magistrate (Tahsildar) and take necessary steps to lodge a complaint with the police; The Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives also did not take any action regarding the availability of Chinese crackers by having further search; Though the officials inspected the place on 14.05.2014, the case was registered only on 17.05.2014 belatedly. Complaining inaction on the part of the respondents-authorities regarding seizure of Chinese crackers and non- compliance of the Explosive Rules, the petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction to enforce the circular and hand over the investigation to CBI.

4. Mr. S.M. Anantha Murugan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that prohibited Chinese crackers which were imported contrary to the rules were seized and no necessary action was taken by the respondents; seizure of Chinese crackers would show that the said crackers, without valid license are being smuggled into India in violations of various provisions of the Explosives Act and Explosives Substances Act and Rules. He demonstrated that if the Chinese crackers are allowed to be sold in India, it would pose a big threat to fire work industry and endanger the safety of the children. Relying upon the materials downloaded from internet, he pointed out that prohibited Chinese items are available in various parts of the country. Therefore, he seeks the case to be transferred to CBI.

5. Taking note of the seriousness of the issue and the situation, this Court directed the Distri


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top