D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
P. R. Renuka – Appellant
Versus
Director of Animal Husbandry Chennai – Respondent
1. The petitioner filed O.A.No.5657 of 2002. On abolition of the Tribunal, the matter stood transferred to this Court and re-numbered as W.P.No.11777 of 2007.
2. The petitioner's father was working as an Office Assistant under the control of the 2nd respondent. He died on 22.02.1998, while in service. He left behind his wife, 3 married daughters and one unmarried daughter as his legal heirs. The petitioner was the first married daughter of the deceased government servant. She applied for compassionate appointment on the ground that she was deserted by her husband and living with her father. The petitioner also produced the order, dated 09.09.1999 granting decree of divorce by the First Additional Family Court, Chennai in F.C.O.P.No.1012 of 1998.
3. While so, the first respondent passed the impugned order, dated 16.09.2002 declining to provide compassionate appointment on the ground that divorce was granted to the petitioner only after the death of her father and hence, she is not entitled to compassionate appointment. The said order is questioned in this writ petition.
4. A reply affidavit was filed by the respondents stating that the petitioner was wait listed for compass
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.