SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 3557

R.SUBBIAH
Minor Mahema – Appellant
Versus
E. K. Lingamoorthy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.P. Sengottuvel, K. Surendranath, N. Manokaran, Advocates.

Judgment

1. Both the above appeals arise out the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2013 in G.W.O.P.No.10 of 2010 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Erode. Since both the appeals arise out the same judgment and decree, they are dispose of by way of this common judgment.

2. The minor appellants represented by their mother in C.M.A.No.2155 of 2013 are the petitioners, the respondents in said appeal are the prospective buyers of the minors' property and the appellants in C.M.A.No.2363 of 2013 are the Objectors/third party, who apposed to grant permission to sell the minors' property, in the said GWOP before the Court below. Since the said GWOP.No.10 of 2010 was dismissed, challenging the order of dismissal made in the said GWOP, the petitioners have filed the present appeal in C.M.A.No.2155 of 2013. Questioning the observation made by the Court below in the said GWOP, to the effect that the unregistered Will dated 17.03.2008 marked on the side of the Objectors is surrounded by suspicion, the Objectors have filed the appeal in C.M.A.No.2363 of 2013.

3. For the sake of convenience, the appellants in C.M.A.No.2155 of 2013 are referred as petitioners and the appellants in C.M






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top