R.SUBBIAH
Minor Mahema – Appellant
Versus
E. K. Lingamoorthy – Respondent
1. Both the above appeals arise out the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2013 in G.W.O.P.No.10 of 2010 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Erode. Since both the appeals arise out the same judgment and decree, they are dispose of by way of this common judgment.
2. The minor appellants represented by their mother in C.M.A.No.2155 of 2013 are the petitioners, the respondents in said appeal are the prospective buyers of the minors' property and the appellants in C.M.A.No.2363 of 2013 are the Objectors/third party, who apposed to grant permission to sell the minors' property, in the said GWOP before the Court below. Since the said GWOP.No.10 of 2010 was dismissed, challenging the order of dismissal made in the said GWOP, the petitioners have filed the present appeal in C.M.A.No.2155 of 2013. Questioning the observation made by the Court below in the said GWOP, to the effect that the unregistered Will dated 17.03.2008 marked on the side of the Objectors is surrounded by suspicion, the Objectors have filed the appeal in C.M.A.No.2363 of 2013.
3. For the sake of convenience, the appellants in C.M.A.No.2155 of 2013 are referred as petitioners and the appellants in C.M
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.