M.VENUGOPAL
V. Kumaravel – Appellant
Versus
B. Muralikrishna – Respondent
1. The Appellant/Complainant has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal before this Court as against the order dated 23.08.2010 in C.C.No.442 of 2009 (in dismissing the complaint) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Erode.
2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Erode, on 23.08.2010 in C.C.No.442 of 2009 passed the impugned order in question observing as under -
“The case called on for hearing to-day to which it had been posted. The complainant not being present in person. No petition filed on behalf of the complainant and notice issued to the complainant. No response. Hence, complaint is dismissed. Accused is acquitted u/s.256, Criminal Procedure Code”.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing at 2.55 p.m., there is no representation on the side of the Appellant. Also on 25.07.2014, there was no representation on his side. However, on that day, there was representation on the side of the Respondent and the matter was directed to be listed on 01.08.2014. Furthermore, on 22.08.2014, when the matter was listed, none appeared on behalf of the Appellant and the matter was directed to be listed on 27.08.2014 as first case in final hearing.
4. On 27.08.2014,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.