SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 2976

R.SUDHAKAR, G.M.AKBAR ALI
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
AA 399, The Chennimalai Industrial WCS Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:M. Swaminathan, Advocate.

Judgment

R. Sudhakar, J.

1. These appeals have been filed by the Revenue against the order dated 2.5.13 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, in ITA Nos.1553/Mds/2012 to 1561/Mds/2012.

2. Though a batch of ten appeals were filed by the Revenue, unsuccessfully, before the Tribunal, they are before this Court on appeal in respect of eight matters alone, contending that for the rest of the two matters, the Department thought it fit not to pursue appeals on account of lesser monetary limits involved in those matters. Hence, the above eight appeals are filed in respect of eight different assessees, but the assessment year in respect of all the assessees is one and the same, i.e., 2009-2010.

3. The following questions of law have been framed for consideration in all these appeals :-

a) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee society eligible for availing the benefits of deduction under Section 80 P (2) (a) (ii) of the Income Tax Act?

b) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee society i

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top